History: Is King Arthur Real?

kingarthurHistory is refreshing in its entirety. If you’re thirsty for knowledge and insight, then sifting through archives and sites such as einsteinsfrig.com is one of the best options you have. Not only will it enable you to point a logical figure to the future, but give you the capacity to analyze your present situation at hand as well.

In that very sense, King Arthur is certainly a terrific historical figure who is worth exploring. To start off, he is a mythical Roman man of valor, who had discretionary powers over Camelot. He called the shots in matters military. He is a familiar figure in history records but the question that still stands is whether he is a real personality or not.

Welsh Historians’ Writings on King Arthur

Though historians have engaged in fierce discourses over the years to establish the authenticity of King Arthur’s existence, it’s still not crystal clear. Records show that he sought to weigh down the Saxon invasion in his territory. In fact, King Arthur appears in Celtic mon Gildas’ writings that delved into the Mons Badonicus at around 500AD. However, he showed up for the first time in Nennius’ writings, a renowned Welsh historian who released a list of 12 battles King Arthur grappled with. On the other hand, Nennius’ poetry is quite illogical in the sense that it would be impossible for one person to successfully participate in all the battles, emerging victorious at the end of the day.

King Arthurs Magical Sword

Afterward, many more Welsh historians drew content from Nennius’ work and spread Arthur’s fame beyond the confines of wales and Celtic, especially after the completion of the Normal conquest of 1066 that occurred in Northern France.

Additionally, Geoffrey of Monmouth also sought to shed more light on King Arthur’s warfare capacity in the book, “History of the Kings of Britain “by describing his magic sword. Although he may not be a real person, countless writers and photographers sought to establish the existence of King Arthur through their own versions. He is certainly a dominant historical figure.